Neumonía de evolución tórpida / Rapid development of pneumonia

No disponible

Maximal static respiratory pressures in children and adolescents.

This study was designed to establish reference values of maximal static respiratory pressures in children and adolescents in our community, and compare them with previous studies. Participants were recruited from three schools (randomly chosen from those located in the metropolitan area of the city of Valencia) after appropriate consent. None of the participants had a previous history of pulmonary, cardiac, and/or skeletal abnormalities, and all of them had normal spirometry. Forced spirometry (Spirotrac III, Vitalograph) and maximal inspiratory (P(ImaxRV)) and expiratory (P(EmaxTLC)) pressure values (Sibelmed 163) were obtained by the same investigator, following national guidelines (SEPAR 1990).We studied 392 subjects (185 males, 207 females) whose ages ranged from 8-17 years. The reproducibility of measurements was investigated in a subgroup of 88 participants (randomly selected from the total sample, and stratified for age and gender) by means of the intraclass correlation coefficient (P(EmaxTLC), 0.98; P(ImaxRV), 0.95). P(EmaxTLC) and P(ImaxRV) values were significantly different between males and females (P < 0.0001) and were normally distributed. A stepwise, linear multiple regression model was built in each gender group (male/female) for the prediction of P(ImaxRV) and P(EmaxTLC) values. Independent variables (weight, height, and age) and their potential interactions were forced to enter the model in order to maximize the square of the multiple correlation coefficient of the resultant equation. This model turned out to be applicable (homoscedasticity, independence, and normality requirements) for P(ImaxRV) (in males and females) and for P(EmaxTLC) (in males but not in females). Variables included in the model were age and the product of weight and height. Their predictive power ranged between 0.21-0.51. In conclusion, P(ImaxRV) and P(EmaxTLC) values increase with age from 8 until 17 years. In all age groups, values were higher in males than in females. Weight, height, and age are included in the predictive equations for P(ImaxRV) (in males and females) and P(EmaxTLC) (in males). Their predictive value is similar to that reported by other authors and ranges between 0.21-0.51. This model is not suitable for the prediction of P(EmaxTLC) in females; the observed mean and range should be used instead.

[Respiratory function and clinical outcome in infants after premature birth and chronic pulmonary disease]. / Función respiratoria y evolución clínica en lactantes con antecedentes de prematuridad y enfermedad pulmonar crónica.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical status and respiratory function of infants with premature birth-related pulmonary sequelae and their correlation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 23 patients with a mean postnatal age of 32 weeks. All infants were born prematurely and developed respiratory disease with radiological features of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. The neonatal clinical status and evolution were quantified by using clinical scoring systems described previously. Parameters of tidal flow volume curves were assessed by pneumotachography. Static compliance and resistance of the respiratory system were obtained using the single-breath occlusion technique. Results were compared with reference values available in the medical literature. RESULTS: Both the neonatal and evolutive clinical status were given a score of moderate severity. Mean values for weight adjusted compliance and resistance and those for respiratory rate and tidal volume were within the normal range. The mean value for time to peak expiratory flow as a ratio of total expiratory time was under the normal range, showing obstructive airway disease. There was a significant correlation (p < 0.05) between the evolutive clinical score and neonatal clinical score (r = 0.48), compliance (r = 0.50) and respiratory rate (r = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Measuring pulmonary function is useful in the follow-up of infants with respiratory disease, providing additional information about the clinical findings, evolution of the illness and subsequent outcome. The development of simple and noninvasive methods explains their increasing application to clinical uses and not exclusively research purposes.

[Risk factors for lung toxicity in pediatric cancer survivors]. / Factores de riesgo para toxicidad pulmonar en supervivientes de cáncer pediátrico.

OBJECTIVE: Our objectives were to determine the prevalence of alterations in lung function among pediatric cancer survivors with known risk factors and to establish clinical and imaging correlations, as well as to establish follow-up criteria. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cancer survivors diagnosed at the Pediatric Oncology Unit between 1971 and 1997 who fulfilled at least one of the following criteria were eligible: 1) primary lung or thoracic wall neoplasm; 2) lung metastasis at diagnosis or later, or; 3) irradiation of mediastinum and/or lung fields. Assessment included respiratory symptomatology questionnaire, physical examination, forced spirometry, static lung volumes, maximal static respiratory pressures, single breath CO diffusing capacity, pulse oximetry and imaging studies. RESULTS: Thirty-five (14 females and 21 males) out of 41 survivors were assessed. Mean age at diagnosis, evaluation and follow-up were 9 (1-14), 18 (10-28) and 9 (3-27) years, respectively. The diagnoses included pleuropulmonary blastoma (1), chest wall Ewing's sarcoma (1), Hodgkin's disease (18), nephroblastoma (7), yolk-sac tumor (2), acute leukemia2), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (1), rhabdomyosarcoma (1), coriocarcinoma of the ovary (1) and osteosarcoma (1). Thirteen patients presented lung metastasis at diagnosis or later. All were administered chemotherapy. Irradiated fields were the mediastinum (dose 20-56 Gy) in 20 cases, the lung (8-30 Gy) in 6 and the spine (24 Gy) in one. Eight underwent thoracotomy. Fourteen percent were dyspneic when walking at the same rate as a person of the same sex and age (grade 2). Twenty percent had a restrictive ventilatory disorder, but none were obstructive. The presence of dyspnea had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values and negative predictive value for the diagnosis of restrictive ventilatory disorder of 67%, 96%, 80% and 93%, respectively. Lung irradiation was associated with an increased risk for the development of restrictive disease. Excluding those who received lung irradiation, survivors under 6 years of age at diagnosis obtained lower spirometric values, lung volumes and DLCO values than survivors aged 6 years or older at diagnosis. There were no differences in pulmonary function values between survivors who received mediastinum irradiation and those who did not. The cumulative dose of cyclophosphamide significantly correlated with FVC, FEV1 and FRC. Pulse oximetry values were > or = 95% in all survivors. Maximal static respiratory pressures were within normal limits in all but one survivors whose other pulmonary function results were normal. Thirty-two percent (11 out of 34) had KCO (diffusing capacity adjusted to alveolar volume) values lower than 80% of reference values. Two survivors of nephroblastoma with pulmonary metastasis and who underwent lung irradiation had radiological signs of lung fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric cancer survivors who were administered intensive chemotherapy and/or lung irradiation are eligible for follow-up of lung function. Those diagnosed before 6 years of age and/or with moderate dyspnea are at high risk of having pulmonary restrictive disease. Imaging studies (chest X-ray) have a low sensitivity that prevents their use as a screening method in the follow-up of cancer survivors.